[*] Changing "reply to" for list

[John Lange]

I agree with the change back to the old way as I have subsequently
discovered that Evolution has a "Reply to List" function (CTRL-L) and I
have gotten used to using it.

The only problem is that Microsoft users do not have an email client
with "reply to list" therefore they must remember to hit "reply to all"
which results in the sender getting two copies of the message or if they
forget the reply does not get back on the list.

Not a big deal.

John

On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 10:50 -0600, Bill Reid wrote:
> I would like to change the reply for this list to the recommended approach of 
> reply to poster not the list.
> 
> John convinced me way back to go with "reply to list" but since most lists use 
> reply to poster I prefer that option.
> 
> The disadvantage is that you have to remember to do a "Reply All" rather than 
> just a reply. With a "Reply All" the poster and list name are both included but 
> the poster will only receive one email.
> 
> The disadvantage of the way it is set up now is that it is non-standard and it 
> is not easy to reply to just the poster if you want. It has not been a big 
> problem on our list but for large lists email meant for just the poster often 
> get emailed to the whole list.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> -- Bill
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk mailing list
> Asterisk at muug.mb.ca
> http://www.muug.mb.ca/mailman/listinfo/asterisk