[RndTbl] cheaper ISP
trevor at tecnopolis.ca
Tue Sep 15 20:19:10 CDT 2015
On 2015-09-11 Colin Stanners wrote:
> But given that Shaw/MTS are already cheap/cheapest and this customer
> wants to go even cheaper that won't work.
So les.net can't do DSL cheaper than MTS?
I want to be clear, we don't want monga d/l or u/l speeds, just
something better than pathetic. Even 1.5M up and 5M down would be fine
(with 2M up better, etc). Anything more than the useless 500k up they
My customer pays $45/mo now for MTS's only option short of their
$100/mo next-best plan. The $100/mo would be fine, but I find that
pricey compared to what Shaw gives for $80/mo.
Why do we have to pay double to get a non-pathetic (but still not great)
u/l speed? Sigh.
As for Hartmut's point: fine and dandy except when it comes to
industrial space (which this is). Nearly every industrial park in town
is outside of Shaw's cabling. :-(
More information about the Roundtable