[RndTbl] "washing" a fork/exec to force all groups

[Hartmut W Sager]

BTW, in case anyone was wondering and didn't want to embarrass me, I should clarify, I do know very well that IMAP/JMAP and SMTP are at different levels in the whole protocol and mechanisms hierarchy.

Hartmut

On Tue 18 Apr 2023 at 11:33:31 -05:00, Hartmut W Sager <hwsager at marityme.net> wrote:
> You may see it in your lifetime.  The IETF JMAP group is hard at work, nearing final standard.  JMAP is the intended replacement for IMAP, and has explicit provision for replacing (or rendering unnecessary) SMTP too.  And JMAP fully supports labels (a la Gmail), not just in the e-mail message base, but in contacts, etc., too (a contact can belong to many "labels"/groups), basically, wherever the labels concept makes sense.
> 
> I am happily using Fastmail, the world's showcase implementation of JMAP.  Gmail (with my own domain names) was my former primary infrastructure, and I am still maintaining it for experiments/education.  I just did some fresh DKIM research in Gmail recently.
> 
> Hartmut
> 
> On Tue 18 Apr 2023 at 08:18:00 -05:00, Adam Thompson <athompso at athompso.net> wrote:
>> I think this just proves that SMTP should be taken out back and put out of its misery, but I don't expect to see that happen in my lifetime.  For better and/or for worse.
>> -Adam
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roundtable mailing list
> Roundtable at muug.ca
> https://muug.ca/mailman/listinfo/roundtable
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://muug.ca/pipermail/roundtable/attachments/20230418/80c586e4/attachment.htm>